This report provides an analysis of the impacts of the enhanced premium subsidies for purchasing health insurance through the Marketplace, or Health Connector in Massachusetts, that the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) temporarily authorized through 2022. While Massachusetts already provided additional state-based financial assistance to many marketplace enrollees prior to ARPA, ARPA enhanced subsidies for some individuals and introduced a new cap on the amount anyone purchasing through the Marketplace has to pay in premiums, effectively expanding eligibility for subsidies to purchase health insurance.

The Build Back Better Act that passed the House of Representatives and is currently stalled in the Senate would extend these subsidies through 2025. In this brief, we evaluate the coverage and cost effects of extending the enhanced subsidies in Massachusetts in 2023. The estimates suggest that, if extended, the enhanced subsidies would:

• reduce the number of people who are uninsured in Massachusetts by 8,000 people;
• reduce household spending on premiums for people who purchase subsidized coverage through the Health Connector; and
• save the state an estimated $133 million in spending on ConnectorCare subsidies in 2023.

The report provides a more detailed look at each of these effects and is intended to be a resource for health care advocates, policymakers, and other stakeholders to understand the impact of these subsidies expiring.

In December 2021, Governor Baker signed Chapter 102 of the Acts of 2021 into law. This legislation, often referred to as the “ARPA bill,” appropriates close to $4 billion, including $2.55 billion in funding directly from the federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). ARPA was passed in March 2021 to provide money to states to start recovering from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Chapter 102 invests money from ARPA in many areas, including housing, infrastructure, education, and economic development. Health services received $950 million in the law, with funding for physical health, behavioral health, long-term care services, and public health initiatives. This issue brief summarizes the key components of Chapter 102 that will affect health and health care in Massachusetts.

In December 2021, Governor Baker signed Chapter 102 of the Acts of 2021 into law. This legislation, often referred to as the “ARPA bill,” appropriates close to $4 billion, including $2.55 billion in funding directly from the federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). ARPA was passed in March 2021 to provide money to states to start recovering from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Chapter 102 invests money from ARPA in many areas, including housing, infrastructure, education, and economic development. Health services received $950 million in the law, with funding for physical health, behavioral health, long-term care services, and public health initiatives. This issue brief summarizes the key components of Chapter 102 that will affect health and health care in Massachusetts.

The goal of this study was to better understand whether Primary Care Providers (PCPs) identify a need for a PCP-to-behavioral health (BH) provider consultation program for adult patients with mental health conditions and substance use disorders (SUDs), and whether they would utilize such a program. Additionally, the study sought to understand the type of BH conditions providers encounter, the proportion of adult primary care patients with BH needs, and the challenges PCPs face in supporting adult patients with BH conditions. These findings are intended to help stakeholders understand how a consultation program might be best structured to provide evidence-based support to PCPs and, in turn, their patients with BH needs.

This brief provides an updated snapshot of the need for behavioral health care and experiences accessing it in the Commonwealth as of 2020/2021, based on a new survey commissioned by the Foundation.  This survey was fielded by NORC at the University of Chicago between December 2020 and March 2021 and gathered information on the need for and access to behavioral health care among Massachusetts adults ages 19 and older and their close relatives. The survey gathered information on the experiences of Massachusetts adults during the 12 months prior to the survey, which covered the period January 2020 through March 2021. Given the timing of the survey and its 12-month look-back period, the survey collected information over roughly the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey also included a series of questions focused explicitly on the link between the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for behavioral health care.

This primer serves as a foundational resource to broaden the collective understanding of racial and ethnic health inequities and disparities in the Commonwealth as part of our new focus area of Structural Racism and Racial Inequities in Health. The primer is intended to support discussion about how our health care system and other systems that impact health enhance or undermine health, and to facilitate the development of solutions to strengthen those systems to serve all Massachusetts residents.

The primer presents a data-informed reflection of the racial and ethnic health inequities and disparities Massachusetts residents confront today. It offers a basis for further discussion and action, including to evolve and improve the data resources that shed light on racism and racial inequities in Massachusetts’ social and health care systems. The Foundation’s work in this focus area will aim to identify and elevate health care policies and practices that will advance health equity and reduce health disparities in the Commonwealth.

To the extent possible in the confines of a data-focused report, the primer acknowledges critical context about the historical and structural contributors to the racial and ethnic health inequities and disparities that exist today. Data limitations and gaps are noted throughout, identifying where new or improved data is needed to provide a comprehensive, cohesive, and actionable set of data to support the Commonwealth’s health equity goals.

As a program that provides publicly-funded health benefits to more than 2 million low-income children and families, seniors and people living with disabilities in Massachusetts, it is not surprising that MassHealth accounts for a large share of the state’s budget.  However, a cursory review of the MassHealth budget can be misleading because it can obscure the billions of dollars in federal revenue that the program generates for the state. This brief looks beyond the budget totals to help stakeholders better understand the actual state cost of MassHealth by accounting for the state and federal partnership that finances this program.

In state fiscal year (SFY) 2022, the state projects it will spend approximately $19.2 billion on MassHealth. This total (or “gross” amount) is approximately 36 percent of total estimated state spending for SFY 2022. However, because the federal government reimburses Massachusetts for more than half of its MassHealth spending, the state’s actual cost for MassHealth (“net of”—or minus—federal revenue) is $8.5 billion or 22 percent of the total state spending in SFY 2022. Fully understanding the actual state cost of MassHealth requires appreciating the details of the federal and other revenue sources that support this essential and comprehensive program.

In response to the health and economic damage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) in March 2021, which makes $1.9 trillion available to individuals, states and territories, counties, cities, community organizations, educational institutions, and other entities. Some funds are intended to shore up or even expand programs and agencies that have been depleted during the pandemic, while other funds are designated or available to create new programs. ARPA contains many health-related provisions, with particular focus on behavioral health services (inclusive of mental health and substance use care), the health care workforce, and programs that make health insurance coverage and health care available to more people. This summary focuses on the key components of ARPA that will affect health care in Massachusetts.

In response to the health and economic damage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) in March 2021, which makes $1.9 trillion available to individuals, states and territories, counties, cities, community organizations, educational institutions, and other entities. Some funds are intended to shore up or even expand programs and agencies that have been depleted during the pandemic, while other funds are designated or available to create new programs. ARPA contains many health-related provisions, with particular focus on behavioral health services (inclusive of mental health and substance use care), the health care workforce, and programs that make health insurance coverage and health care available to more people. This summary focuses on the key components of ARPA that will affect health care in Massachusetts.

In response to the health and economic damage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) in March 2021, which makes $1.9 trillion available to individuals, states and territories, counties, cities, community organizations, educational institutions, and other entities. Some funds are intended to shore up or even expand programs and agencies that have been depleted during the pandemic, while other funds are designated or available to create new programs. ARPA contains many health-related provisions, with particular focus on behavioral health services (inclusive of mental health and substance use care), the health care workforce, and programs that make health insurance coverage and health care available to more people. This summary focuses on the key components of ARPA that will affect health care in Massachusetts.

Health care payers, providers, and policymakers are increasingly pursuing value-based payment (VBP) to improve the quality of care and population health while controlling rising health care costs. When implemented in Medicaid, VBP programs often include children and adults in the same model, though these models may not fully account for children’s distinct health needs.

This report seeks to inform the work of Massachusetts policymakers and stakeholders to better incorporate children’s health needs and experiences within the payment models in the MassHealth Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Program by examining lessons from states and providers throughout the country.  Based on the results of an environmental scan, including a review of peer-reviewed and gray literature and interviews with 18 subject matter experts, this report identifies and describes four main VBP approaches for delivering care to pediatric populations. The authors then synthesize key themes and lessons learned for successfully implementing VBP models for children. These findings suggest there is great opportunity for Massachusetts to serve as a leader in this field, and the report lays out a set of policy and program considerations to help Massachusetts design an approach to better serving children within and alongside the framework of the existing ACO Program. Ultimately, adapting VBP for pediatric populations requires recognition that pediatric VBP models should not be focused on short-term savings but rather on improving quality of care to support child health and long-term population health outcomes.

Addressing timely access to behavioral health care through the adoption of open access methods supports the well-being of people with behavioral health conditions, improves staff productivity, and increases financial stability for provider organizations. However, no study has previously documented the experience of provider organizations using this model in Massachusetts.

The report identifies organizations that operate open access today and highlights the approaches that have been most successful. The report also pinpoints keys to success for organizations to consider in adopting an open access model and offers policy recommendations to promote the broader adoption of open access in the Massachusetts behavioral health care system.  The case studies provide detailed descriptions of each model, describe the successes and challenges of implementation, and indicate how COVID-19 has impacted operations.

This budget brief highlights the state fiscal year (SFY) 2021 budget – which ran from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 – for MassHealth and other health reform programs. The SFY21 budget was delayed by six months due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting economic challenges and fiscal uncertainty. Included within the budget was $18.9 billion designated for health care coverage programs and related operational expenses. This brief provides an analysis of spending in the SFY2021 budget associated with MassHealth and other health care coverage and health reform activities, as well as a summary of new initiatives included in the SFY2021 budget that are expected to impact MassHealth program spending.

This five-part series of issue briefs describes MassHealth’s impact on the health and finances of its members, families, and communities, as well as on the wide variety of stakeholders and sectors outside of the traditional health care realm that benefit from the program, including:

• the Commonwealth’s schools and school‐aged children, teens, and young adults;
• the state’s economy and businesses, including how MassHealth supports working families, reduces uncompensated care costs, and draws federal funds into the state;
• the behavioral health care system, addressing how MassHealth provides coverage, access, and delivery of services across the full behavioral health care continuum; and
• justice-involved persons, describing how MassHealth supports re-entry into the community.

Key findings from this series were featured at a Foundation virtual event on Wednesday, June 30^th from 2:00-4:00 pm. Click here to view event materials.

This report describes the results of a qualitative analysis of the MassHealth Accountable Care Organization (ACO) program over its first two years of operation. The Foundation commissioned this report to provide timely insight into what is working well, challenges stakeholders are facing, and opportunities to strengthen the program. The findings from this analysis are intended to fill a current gap in publicly available data evaluating the ACO program; they elevate the perspective of organizations operating within this new program, and can be used to help inform policymakers and administrators as they continue to build on and refine the ACO program.

This analysis was informed by a series of interviews with 34 individuals representing 21 organizations, including ACOs, managed care organizations, Long-Term Services and Supports and Behavioral Health Community Partners (CPs), Social Services Organizations (SSOs), and other stakeholders involved in the program. The following five key themes emerged from this research:

1. Interviewees overwhelmingly support the Accountable Care Organization program and praise MassHealth’s stakeholder engagement efforts to improve the program.
2. Interviewees report progress toward improving care delivery but acknowledge that making a measurable impact on health outcomes takes time.
3. The Accountable Care Organization program sparked the formation of beneficial partnerships among Accountable Care Organizations, Community Partners, and Social Service Organizations.
4. The Community Partner Program’s complexity created a burden for Accountable Care Organizations and Community Partners.
5. The Flexible Services Program is promising, but relationships between Accountable Care Organizations and Social Service Organizations could benefit from more structure.

To ensure future success of the ACO program, the report also makes specific programmatic recommendations for strengthening the program moving forward. These recommendations focus on: (1) supporting improved communication and data sharing among ACOs, CPs, and SSOs; and (2) addressing structural elements of the program that hinder partnerships in the CP and Flexible Services Programs.